Prediction of Joyce Williams vs Margaret Lee Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
J. Williams vs M. Lee

Joyce Williams

GBR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Margaret Lee

GBR

1

Win

Played

2

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Title

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Williams 1 - 2 Lee

They have played 7 sets in total, with Joyce Williams winning 3 and Margaret Lee winning 4. The last match between Margaret Lee and Joyce Williams was at the Hampstead, 06-04-1964, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Margaret Lee getting the victory 6-2 8-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Williams	1
Lee	2

Last H2H Matches:

(R2) Hampstead(04-06-64)

Stats

Margaret Lee

Joyce Williams

(SF) Exmouth(08-19-63)

Stats

Joyce Williams

Margaret Lee

(R4) Roehampton(04-03-61)

Stats

Margaret Lee

Joyce Williams

J. Williams vs M. Lee H2H Profile

J. Williams	Stats	M. Lee
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
63.79% (340-193)	Career Total W/L	50.64% (79-77)
0	Clay	2
1	Grass	0
1	Total H2H Matches	2
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

J. Williams vs M. Lee Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Joyce Williams has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Margaret Lee has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Joyce Williams, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Margaret Lee has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Joyce Williams has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Margaret Lee has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Joyce Williams has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Margaret Lee winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Joyce Williams has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 123/62), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 59% (W/L 30/21). Margaret Lee has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 66% (W/L 46/35), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/5).
Player level: In the last year, Joyce Williams has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Margaret Lee has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 3 times before with Joyce Williams winning 1 times and Margaret Lee being victorious 2 times. They have played 7 sets in total, with Joyce Williams winning 3 and Margaret Lee winning 4.
The last match between Joyce Williams and Margaret Lee was at the Hampstead, 06-04-1964, Round: R2, Surface: Clay, with Margaret Lee getting the victory 6-2 8-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Joyce Williams has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Margaret Lee has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Joyce Williams has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Margaret Lee has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Joyce Williams has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Margaret Lee has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Joyce Williams vs Margaret Lee Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

J. Williams vs M. Lee H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

J. Williams	Stats	M. Lee
1	H2H Matches Won	2
3	Sets Won	4
35	Games Won	38
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
33% (1/3)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	67% (2/3)
0% (0/1)	Deciding Set Win %	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
50% (1/2)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	50% (1/2)

Recent Performance Stats

J. Williams Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Edinburgh - 09-07-1979
Anne TrippA. Tripp	W	6-3 6-1	Stats
R4 A DouglasA. Douglas	W	6-1 6-1	Stats
F Lea AntonoplisL. Antonoplis	L	7-6 6-4	Stats
SF Debbie ParkerD. Parker	W	6-3 6-4	Stats
Sutton - 06-05-1979
R4 Pascale BonneteauP. Bonneteau	W	3-6 7-6 6-2	Stats

View All

M. Lee Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Unknown Tournament - 23-06-1969
Q1 Lany KaligisL. Kaligis	L	6-3 4-6 6-4	Stats
Wimbledon Plate - 01-07-1968
R4 Marilyn AschnerM. Aschner	L	6-2 6-1	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 24-06-1968
R1 Faye UrbanF. Urban	L	5-7 6-0 7-5	Stats
Unknown Tournament - 10-06-1968
R3 Maria BuenoM. Bueno	L	6-2 6-2	Stats
Surbiton - 27-05-1968
R2 Judith SalomeJ. Salome	W	6-2 6-2	Stats

View All

J. Williams vs M. Lee Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

J. Williams	Stats	M. Lee
63.79% (340/193)	YTD Win/Loss	50.64% (79/77)
62.46% (717/431)	Sets Win/Loss	50.00% (176/176)
55.96% (5759/4532)	Games Win/Loss	50.17% (1639/1628)
61.90% (13/8)	Hard Win/Loss	0% (0/0)
66.49% (123/62)	Clay Win/Loss	56.79% (46/35)
64.55% (71/39)	Indoor Hard W/L	38.46% (5/8)
62.05% (103/63)	Grass Win/Loss	49.12% (28/29)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
15.93	Average Opponent Rank	1.74
45.45% (10/12)	Slam W/L	45.45% (5/6)
42.86% (3/4)	Cups W/L	0% (0/0)
51.28% (20/19)	Futures W/L	0.00% (0/4)
64% (330/517)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	49% (74/150)
0% (0/0)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	100% (1/1)
25% (1/4)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
52% (57/109)	Deciding Set Win %	47% (23/49)
91% (335/305)	1st Set Won, Won Match	80% (74/59)
9% (335/30)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	20% (74/15)
14% (187/27)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	21% (77/16)